الصراع السياسي بين حركة أمل وحزب الله في لبنان (1982-1990)

الباحث

علاء رافد صالح عبد الطائي

المشرف

فتحي عباس خلف الجبوري

الجامعة

جامعة الموصل

الكلية / القسم

التربية للعلوم الإنسانية / التاريخ

الشهادة

ماجستير

السنة

2024

لغة الرسالة

عربي

الكلمات المفتاحية

حركة أمل;حزب الله;لبنان;الحرب الأهلية اللبنانية

The modern and contemporary history of the Arab world has witnessed rapid political, economic, and social developments and transformations due to the stirring of sectarian or ethnic ideas, which have taken on a militant character in expressing their identity and orientations, and their need to establish their existence within a multi-sectarian and multi- denominational society, especially in a country like Lebanon. Studying the conflict between two movements or political parties stemming from a social sect in Lebanon provides a clear and accurate justification for the manifestation of historical facts. The political conflict between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah in Lebanon during the period 1985-1990 is a fundamental topic for a deep understanding of contemporary Lebanese history and its internal politics. This conflict between the two main Shiite groups in Lebanon had a profound impact on the stability of the country and the political decision-making processes during that critical era. The political conflict between factions and political entities in Lebanon has always been a central focus in the study of the country's history and politics. The confrontation between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah from 1985 to 1990 is one of the most prominent conflicts that had a deep impact on the overall political and social conditions in Lebanon. The importance of studying this conflict lies in the fact that it represents a political and ideological struggle between the most prominent Shiite currents in Lebanon, which at that time were active and influential political forces on the Lebanese scene. This conflict involved deep disputes over political priorities and the regional and international agendas of both movements, in addition to the sectarian and ideological differences inherent in this confrontation. The main importance of studying this conflict lies in its status as one of the most significant political and ideological struggles in Lebanon's contemporary history. This confrontation between the two main Shiite forces in the country at the time had profound and comprehensive implications for Lebanon's stability and the political decision-making process during that critical period. The Amal Movement and Hezbollah competed for political leadership of the Shiite community, and this conflict extended to encompass the political priorities and regional agendas of each, as well as deep sectarian and ideological differences between them. Therefore, analyzing this conflict is key to understanding the reality of Lebanese politics during that pivotal stage in the country's history. Several issues surround the study of the political conflict between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah in Lebanon during the period 1985-1990, the most important of which is the scarcity of reliable and comprehensive sources on this conflict. Many documents and files related to the details of this confrontation remain closed to researchers or are not available to the public, making the process of research and analysis difficult and limited in some aspects. The disparity in narratives and interpretations presented by various parties and entities involved in this conflict presents a significant challenge for researchers to achieve an objective and comprehensive understanding of the developments and dimensions of this conflict. Additionally, the considerable overlap between internal political conflict in Lebanon and intertwined regional and international influences adds complexity to the analysis of its motivations and developments. The political and security sensitivities surrounding this topic in Lebanon even now make some sources and documents related to it prohibited or difficult to obtain. The study consists of three chapters preceded by an introduction and followed by a conclusion and appendices. The first chapter discusses the ideological differences between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah, divided into three sections: the emergence and development of the Amal Movement, the emergence and development of Hezbollah, and the ideological trends between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah. The second chapter addresses the nature of the conflict between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah, divided into three sections: the Palestinian camp wars and the stance of the Amal Movement and Hezbollah, the military conflict between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah, and the political rivalry between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah. The third and final chapter examines the external influences of Syria and Iran, with the first section discussing the Syrian influence and the second section discussing the Iranian influence. The study benefited from several sources that were the cornerstones of the research in all its chapters. The most important of these was Theodore Hanf's "Lebanon: Coexistence in Times of War from State Collapse to Nation Rebirth," translated by Maurice Saliba, published by the Center for Arab-European Studies, Paris, Dar Lahd Khater for Printing and Publishing (Beirut, 1993). This source was one of the most important from which the researcher benefited greatly, providing valuable information that enriched the study. Other sources used by the researcher included Joseph Alagha's "Hezbollah: A History of the Political and Ideological Development (1978- 2008)," translated by Nadine Nasrallah, 1st ed., (Beirut, 2008), and Abdul Rauf Sinno's "The Lebanon War: The Collapse of the State and the Fracturing of Society," 1st ed., Arab Publishers (Beirut, 2008). Writing on the political conflict between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah can be a challenging and complex process. The researcher faced several difficulties in this topic, including obtaining reliable and unbiased information, given the political and ideological nature of the subject. It can be challenging to obtain objective and unbiased information, especially from the official sources of both parties. Analyzing the political interactions to understand and interpret the factors influencing the relationship between the Amal Movement and Hezbollah and how this relationship has evolved over time requires an in-depth analysis of the political, social, and historical context. Maintaining neutrality and objectivity is challenging given the sensitivity of the topic, and it can be difficult to maintain an objective and neutral perspective when analyzing different events and opinions. Balancing theory and reality, linking the theoretical and conceptual framework of political conflict with the practical reality and actual political practices, and accessing primary sources such as interviews with political leaders and activists and unpublished documents can also be difficult.

طلب نسخة من الملف

الملفات غير منشورة على الموقع. اترك بياناتك وسيتواصل معك موظفو قسم الشؤون الثقافية والفنون لإرسال النسخة مجاناً.

الاسم

رقم الهاتف

البريد الإلكتروني

الغرض من الطلب (اختياري)

إرسال الطلب