الرواة الذين خرج لهم البخاري في صحيحه وقال عنهم الذهبي في الكاشف: (ثقة) - دراسة نقدية

الباحث

خولة ذنون محمد فراج

المشرف

عمار جاسم محمد العبيدي

الجامعة

جامعة الموصل

الكلية / القسم

التربية للعلوم الإنسانية / علوم القرآن والتربية الإسلامية

الشهادة

ماجستير

السنة

2022

لغة الرسالة

A

الكلمات المفتاحية

صحيح البخاري;الذهبي;الكاشف;علم الرجال

This thesis deals with the narrators whom Al-Bukhari narrated in his Sahih, and Al-Dhahabi said about them in Al-Kashef: (Wathiq), and their number is thirty-eight narrators. These narrators were the scholars who spoke about them, so I wanted to shed light on them and clarify Al-Bukhari’s approach in the narration about them; By mentioning the sayings of the scholars about them to defend him in that he suspended the narration from them, And an explanation of the reason for the comment, or he singled out the narration from them, or he mentioned specific words, in order to find out the ruling on these hadiths. To clarify the reason for this saying, and an accurate description of Al-Bukhari’s approach in the narration about them, and to identify its features. The rules of wounding and modification went through multiple stages and were not regulated at the beginning of its inception. The first of these ranks, by agreement, was documentation, and the historical origin of this term is not precisely known, but it passed through stages until it reached us in its conventional meaning. What is meant by this term differs between these stages, as it may release trust in the rooting stage in the sense of the narrator’s authority to protest, Or the consideration of his hadith in the least of its conditions, and it may be called for someone who was just in his religion, regardless of the strength of control, and he is known by the presumption of the case, If the narrator has a difference and a wound, خ then this indicates the trust in the religion, which is a sign of his justice often, whether his hadith is authentic, or hasan, or less than that, provided that the narrator is in the rank of consideration in the least of his conditions. As for the idiomatic meaning of the term trust after the idiomatic taqweed, it is the one that applies to the controlling justice. Based on that, the narrators for whom it was narrated in his Sahih, and Al-Dhahabi said about them in Al-Kashef: (Wathiq), thirty-eight narrators, are not of the same degree. Documentation is in four layers mentioned by Imam Al-Dhahabi in Al-Mawaqqa, and the study showed that eleven novels fall into the first layer of documentation; They are the ones whose documentation was declared, and there was no injury reported on them, and nine narrators are in the second layer whose documentation was declared, and a word of defamation was mentioned in them. And eight narrators are in the third layer, which includes the narrators who were mentioned in the works of documentation without a text on their documentation, and seven narrators whose documentation was declared by the scholars, and Al- Bukhari narrated to them, and the imams of Al-Jarh and Al-Ta’deel said about them: (There is no problem with it). He narrated on the authority of two of the narrators with whom he differed about their companionship, and al-Dhahabi said about them in al-Kashef: (wathiq) One of them: Al-Hafiz counted him as a companion. And the second: Al-Hafiz mentioned him in Al-Isbah, and he said: “A well-known follower,” and he trusted him in approximation, and another narrator said about him: Abu Zara’a said: There is nothing wrong with him. The hadiths of Hassan, and none of the د scholars authenticated him. Al-Bukhari commented the narration on four narrators in his Sahih, and he produced for each one of them one hadith, and he produced twenty-seven narrators connected hadiths. And seven narrators have connected and suspended hadiths. Six narrators of his sheikhs included connected hadiths, and al-Dhahabi said about them: (wathiq). He narrated from four narrators to add to the wording of their hadiths, and he included them on the occasion of his martyrdom in the chapter. And there are three narrators who differed regarding the transmission and transmission of the isnads of their hadiths, so he extracted their hadiths because their paths are the soundest and most correct. He selected six narrators for their uniqueness in narrating their hadiths. And if the hadith has a follow-up or a witness, he mentioned it in its chapter and it is most of his action, and he may mention it in another place.

طلب نسخة من الملف

الملفات غير منشورة على الموقع. اترك بياناتك وسيتواصل معك موظفو قسم الشؤون الثقافية والفنون لإرسال النسخة مجاناً.

الاسم

رقم الهاتف

البريد الإلكتروني

الغرض من الطلب (اختياري)

إرسال الطلب